The Civil Society, Negotiational Participation and Pluralism: “Demos”, Where Are You?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13334648

Keywords:

Democracy, society, civil society, negotiational participation, pluralism

Abstract

Democracy has been a political phenomenon for human societies for almost 2500 years. Perhaps one of the main reasons for this is that human societies act hypocritically in accepting and applying a phenomenon, and that the phenomenon in question is used by certain segments of human societies to protect and maintain political power and power. There are many examples of this argument in history. On the way to eliminate this thesis, perhaps the most important socio-political elements in human societies in the name of democracy can be described with the concepts of civil society, deliberation, participation, deliberative participation and pluralism. Because without these, neither the continuity of democracy, nor the healthy applicability of democracy, nor the basic principles of democracy such as free elections, freedom of the press, freedom of thought-expression-conscience, the right to choose and be elected, etc. will remain meaningful. Therefore, in the absence of civil society, deliberative participation and pluralism, the democracy practiced in that society will be a “fake and so-called” democracy. The aim of this study is to examine the relationships and interactions of these three phenomena, which shed light on and realize the existence of a real and democratic democracy in a society, in a social context. The importance of this study is to draw attention to the fact that democracy comes to life and is applicable in societies and the political regimes that govern them, with advanced democratic understandings and attitudes such as civil society, deliberative participation and pluralism, rather than basic principles and principles. In this research, which has mainly adopted the qualitative research methodology, scientific books, articles, theses, reports and papers are used to obtain scientific data; scientific research methods such as document analysis, content analysis and hermeneutics are benefited from.

References

Aristotle. (1941). Politics, in The Basic Works of Aristotle. (Richard McKeon ed., Benjamin Jowett trans. New York: Random House.

Aristoteles. (1944). Politika, Cilt I-III. (Niyazi Berkes, Çev.). İstanbul: Maarif Basımevi.

ATTAC (The Association for the Taxation of financial Transactions and Citizen’s Action). (2012). Kimin Avrupası?: Halkın Avrupası ile Şirketlerin Avrupası Arasında. (Deniz Banoğlu, Çev.). İstanbul: Metis Siyah Beyaz.

Cohen, Jean ve Arato, Andrew. (1992). Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Daly, Martin (2000). A Fine Balance: Women’s Labor Market Participation in International Comparison. F.W. Sharpf, V.A. Schmidt (eds.). Welfare and Work in the Open Economy. (s. 467-510). New York: Oxford University Press.

Demir, Nesrin. (2010). Demokrasinin Temel İlkeleri ve Modern Demokrasi Kuramları. Ege Akademik Bakış, 10(2), 597-611.

Demirović, Alex. (2004). Der Zeitkern der Wahrheit. Zur Forschungslogik kritischer Gesellschaftstheorie. Joachim Beerhorst, Alex Demirović ve Michael Guggemos (eds.). Ktirische Theorie im gesellschaftlichen Strukturwandel. (s. 475-499). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Diez, Georg ve Roth, Chtistopher. (2010). What Happened? The 80*81 Book Collection: Part One, Zürih: Edition Partick Frey.

Ehrenberg, John. (1999). Civil Society: The Critical History of the Idea. New York: New York University Press.

Erdoğan, Mustafa. (1999). Anayasal Demokrasi, 2.b. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.

Gordon, Robert H. (2000). Kant, Smith and Hegel: The Market and the Categorical Imperative. Frank Trentmann (ed.). Paradoxes of Civil Society: New Perspectives on Modern German and British History. (s. 85- 105). New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books.

Gönenç, Özgür. (2007). Küresel Dünyanın Yeni Sömürü Silahı. İstanbul Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29, 79-91.

Habermas, Jürgen. (2002). “Öteki” Olmak, “Öteki”yle Yaşamak: Siyaset Kuramı Yazıları. (İlknur Aka, Çev.). İstanbul: YKY Yayınları.

Hampton, Jean. (1986). Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Heywood, Andrew. (2006). Siyaset. İstanbul: Liberte Yayınları.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participation

Hyppolite, Jean. (1969). Studies on Marx and Hegel. (J. O’Neill, Trans.). New York: Basic Books Inc.

Kaynar, Mete Kaan. (2005). Sivil Toplumun Kavramsal Tarihi ve Sivil Toplumla İlgili Güncel Tartışmalar. H.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1), 339-369.

KA-DER (Kadın Adayları Destekleme ve Eğitme Derneği). (2005). Eşit Temsil İçin Cinsiyet Kotası: Erkek Demokrasiden Gerçek Demokrasiye. İstanbul: Acar Matbaacılık.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-23

How to Cite

Ak, G. (2024). The Civil Society, Negotiational Participation and Pluralism: “Demos”, Where Are You?. Journal of Sustainable Equity and Social Research, 1(1), 01–14. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13334648

Issue

Section

Articles